tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post1422108437439342823..comments2023-10-17T13:20:45.145+05:30Comments on The Little Ranting Reptile and Other Stories....: Double whammyStupidosaurhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-48437892026915922622009-09-05T23:43:55.435+05:302009-09-05T23:43:55.435+05:30That was funny...
Good sense of humor...
How to...That was funny...<br /><br />Good sense of humor...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.makemysite.in" rel="nofollow"> How to make a website </a>workhardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02139837491287164337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-21591005474722741812009-08-31T22:48:51.231+05:302009-08-31T22:48:51.231+05:30@Harini:
You really expected Stupidosaur to answe...<b>@Harini:</b><br /><br />You really expected Stupidosaur to answer that?<br /><br />Let me attempt in brief here.<br /><br />Length of my comment = wonder quotient of Stupidosaur X Weirdness quotient of Ketan X (time I have in any day/10)<br /><br />As you could see from above equation, weirdness quotient of Ketan is a constant, wonder quotient of Stupidosaur is nearly a constant, but rises day-by-day, hence a generalized increase in length of my comments, and time availiable to me in a day is somewhat variable depending upon how much time I sleep and eat in any given day!<br /><br />I've just cited my reason for commenting here, though not complained that he doesn't comment on my blog!<br /><br />What have we done to Srishti? She's just being haunted by a <a href="http://brainbaloney.blogspot.com/2009/07/ib-sick.html" rel="nofollow">chicken soul (click)</a>! ;)<br /><br /><b>@Srishti:</b><br /><br />I know you're perfectly normal. I was just playing <i>deduction-induction</i>, and Stupidosaur was playing <i>induction-deduction</i>. You were just our shuttle cock for a few days! Okay, you're female, and a juvenile, does that make you a <i>shuttle chick</i>? ;)<br /><br />BTW, astigmatism is also an eye disorder, when beyond a particular limit, and is present in everyone who has normal eyes!<br /><br />But yes, 'astigmati-<i>whatever</i>' seems to be a particularly prevalent disorder, particularly among females. It can't be <i>dismissed</i> so easily! ;)<br /><br />TC, both of you!Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-45228594222430196052009-08-31T21:35:54.399+05:302009-08-31T21:35:54.399+05:30@Deluded: You think stupii is a lovely nic? Is tha...@Deluded: You think stupii is a lovely nic? Is that sarcasm?<br /><br />@Stupii and Ketan: I'm perfectly NORMAL and have no eye defects. Nor ANY ego problems. Nor any astigmati-whatever.Srishtihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04700351745397925533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-24156244403748412792009-08-31T19:03:10.487+05:302009-08-31T19:03:10.487+05:30@ stupii (im calling you that :P)
Whats with keta...@ stupii (im calling you that :P)<br /><br />Whats with ketan???<br /> i never did get it?<br />But why does he always write such long comments about how you are and about you not commenting on him blog??<br /><br />Forgive the poor innocent girl and spare her of the ......... (you-know-who-ness)<br /><br />:D♪♪Happy Go Lucky♪♪https://www.blogger.com/profile/01269515158933060231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-33049854585105840272009-08-31T02:52:42.664+05:302009-08-31T02:52:42.664+05:30@Ketan
Being vain, I comment not when 'made&#...@Ketan<br /><br />Being vain, I comment not when 'made' to, but only when I want to, and in that vein, but never in vain.<br /><br />(Just playing with words. *Chuckle*)<br /><br /><br />Hey deluded.<br />Put an end to this man.<br />What were you pointing out in Ketan's 2nd comment?<br /><br />We grant that<br />1) You are homophobic.<br />2) Ketan isn't gay.<br />3) I am not gay or homophobic. (Except to the degree that a woman may be phobic of rapist. Not all gay and straight men are rapist)<br /><br />So feel absolutely free to answer, or not answer (like it matters! :P)Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-37094301183962648332009-08-30T23:49:35.348+05:302009-08-30T23:49:35.348+05:30Sorry, I forgot to mention in my previous comment ...Sorry, I forgot to mention in my previous comment that deluded does not give that angle as far as commenting is concerned. But even otherwise, from his track record, he seems to homophobic, rather than wanting to attract the attention of a male (you can make me that much allowance! please, please, please!!)!<br /><br />But anyway, I 'made' you comment in vain! :P<br /><br />TC.Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-87569103568857088492009-08-30T23:11:56.642+05:302009-08-30T23:11:56.642+05:30Arrey Ketan Sir! Ye aapne kya keh diya!!
Ab delud...Arrey Ketan Sir! Ye aapne kya keh diya!!<br /><br />Ab deluded bura maan jayega!<br /><br />I think he mentions the topic in at least one third of the posts, if not all (just gut feel, no statistical analysis)! Now he will think you just don't read all his posts, or at least not carefully!<br /><br />Going in reverse chronological order: <br />--------------------------<br />Latest post <br /><br />http://the-deluded-doctor.blogspot.com/2009/08/whatever-youre-going-through-its-not.html<br /><br />has the lines<br /><br />you could have made the t shirt pink, drawn flowers on it, written gay revolution on it, and it would still sell more that what they tried.<br />--------------------<br /><br />http://the-deluded-doctor.blogspot.com/2009/08/independence-never-meant-much-part-2.html<br /><br />when a rich uncle with a very avant garde dressing sense, offers you a lift in a car.<br /><br />be scared.<br />very scared.<br /><br />I was on guard for the whole journey.<br /><br />but then.<br /><br />I admit gladly.<br />I was wrong to.<br /><br />no uncle touching. no inappropriate jokes from any uncle that day.<br /><br />--------------------<br /><br />http://the-deluded-doctor.blogspot.com/2009/08/saturday-was-highlight-of-month-part1.html<br /><br />A. the bus trip to mangalore<br /><br />nausea.<br />no male to male fondling. yay!<br /><br />.<br />.<br />.<br />.<br />attempt at coolness and ungayness fail.<br />-----------------<br />http://the-deluded-doctor.blogspot.com/2009/07/tripartite.html<br /><br /><br />deluded: hit on by the wrong kind of people in the wrong kind of way.<br /><br />life: not going good ever since section 377 was taken out.<br />-----------------<br /><br />Some 5 posts after this are gay-free zone and I haven't checked further down the line. But at least deluded keep bringing it for humour ever since the topic had become national new recently.<br /><br />I was not saying he calls anyone gay in particular at his or your or anybody's blog. Just said he brings that angle in some way to every topic!Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-8882504376588643222009-08-30T22:13:08.362+05:302009-08-30T22:13:08.362+05:30@the gay angle: Somehow, deluded has never given m...<b>@the gay angle:</b> Somehow, deluded has never given me the gay angle either on my or his own blog! Maybe, that's why I could never see that! So, my post-esque comments above are totally much ado about nothing! TC.Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-81224842991358473242009-08-30T15:09:16.946+05:302009-08-30T15:09:16.946+05:30@ketan & deluded on the 'pink chaddi' ...@ketan & deluded on the 'pink chaddi' issue.<br /><br />Well yes deluded I know you were not referring to any post in any way, but only to this from Ketan<br /><br />//Hope to see you find me more interesting!<br /><br />I thought you were trying to jokingly give it a gay angle. I thought so because you often give a joking gay angle in many of your own posts.<br /><br />So I took it up from there. There can be nothing gayer than Ketan having a pink chaddi and me shredding it :P.<br /><br />It was also a kind of retort to a comment in which I presumed Ketan was trying to call me gay (in very camouflaged way of course, that most would not have noticed).<br /><br />So actually there was a lot of double talk going on<br /><br />//3) Some of the post I feel like verbally shredding to pieces<br />4) One such was 'Pink Chaddi' post.<br /><br />3) was initially referring to how I strongly feel like refuting some of Ketan's posts and ideas (not all, many are quite well thought)<br />In 4) I gave an example. But 3) and 4) taken till that point became sort of jocular 'shredding ketan's pink chaddi'. But I knew it would be a cryptic joke to get. So I explained in next 2 sentences. But I guess you both still found it too cryptic ! LOL!<br /><br />@deluded<br /><br />Yes there are girls of our kind. Our kind, btw is not dinosaurs. I know you have read and commented on this post. But read all its comments too. It will tell you about girl Stupidosaurs:<br /><br /><a href="http://saying-private-yarn.blogspot.com/2008/06/alternate-ad-for-monsterjobscom-or.html" rel="nofollow">An alternate ad for monsterjobs.com or something like it.</a>Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-20920817056971342352009-08-30T14:42:34.480+05:302009-08-30T14:42:34.480+05:30...@The fate of the guy who did droolingly propose......<b>@The fate of the guy who did droolingly propose to 'both' once:</b> LOL, and just wondering if 'stupii' kind of 'reduction to the absurd' could be applied here, like if his diplopia would be congenital, he'd anyway think every double person to be 'one', and if he'd have acquired it some time later, he'd know that what appears to be two would actually be... but then, this exercise isn't exactly worth it, and plus it'll take me some time to recover from the shock of punch/footwear of your logic, and develop enough courage to do a '<i>miyaan ki footwear; miyaan ka sar</i>' on you!<br /><br /><b>@query about deluded's eyes:</b> I haven't seem them yet. But you definitely seem to be having reptilian simple eyes that can spot just so many things on at least the internet terrain!<br /><br /><b>@nonzero probabilities:</b> Though, you'd advised me to be patient, and not expect too much, I'm hoping against hope that a few (specifically, couple) of my wishes come true, which also just like the above comment of yours involve your volition!<br /><br />Thanks for taking time to comment (and this 'thanks' though not brimming with emotions, is not insincere)<br /><br />Take care.<br /><br />PS: Thanks for pointing out the 'very long post'-tag.Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-86201053495953976632009-08-30T14:40:38.914+05:302009-08-30T14:40:38.914+05:30@Stupidosaur's reduction to the absurd:
Oh, t...<b>@Stupidosaur's reduction to the absurd:</b><br /><br />Oh, thanks, Stupidosaur! I mean it! For pointing out my fatal error in trying to get through a smart comment beyond your watchful eyes. Which only tells me to be more careful the next time around I comment anywhere close to where you're likely to comment back! Especially, anything that has remotely got anything to do with logic/humor/(the English) language/general knowledge!<br /><br />I realized my folly the moment I read your first sentence, and could see you'd left loopholes (deliberate?) in your logic.<br /><br />Actually, in my original comment had I not ended the sentence with 'everywhere', I still had some chance of defending my comment! Like, I could've said that since Srishti is egoist, she's developed a very balanced personality, and her eyes have a special predilection for anything symbolic of perfect balance in her surroundings. The antiparallel symmetry of 'p' and 'd' is just one such case--totally reminiscent of the complementarity of ying and yang. So, whenever she sees those letters in that sequence and 'i' between them, she thinks of 'balance', and thinks of herself, which in turn makes her think of 'i', and her inflated sense of ego would make her see two 'i's instead of one, and that's how she'd write/type her spellings. And whenever she'd type some word like 'stupid', her heightened sense of 'i' (diplopia for 'i' specifically flanked by 'p' and 'd') coupled with her thus wrongly memorized spelling, would make her write 'stupii' displacing the 'd' in the end.<br /><br />'cuz it would be actually a manifestation of 'loss of balance' dropping 'd' from the p-d coupling. (Don't think I wanted to show a distorted version of 69 by writing p-d; at least, I've put a hyphen between the two, and you can't tell who the 'hyphen' belongs to ;) )<br /><br />And since Srishti is very adept at typing, and doesn't require to look at the monitor while typing, the vicious cycle you've talked of won't occur! But no point crying over spilt comments! Afterall I did write 'everywhere' at the end of the comment, and my hypothesis would've been disproved the moment she'd have correctly spelled 'rapid', 'insipid' or 'lipid'! But more important, any such attempt on my part would be too lame.<br /><br /><b>@sweet revenge:</b> with regard to your and my attempts at humor (irrespective of how much mine would suck and yours won't!), and the probability of <b>actually</b> finding them insulting, I was even with you even before you posted that!...Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-7174274433495955472009-08-30T13:49:14.798+05:302009-08-30T13:49:14.798+05:303) and 4) theories, debates and discussions will h...3) and 4) theories, debates and discussions will happen at their right place - your blog, those posts. Some day.Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-43543065999807661812009-08-30T13:39:44.659+05:302009-08-30T13:39:44.659+05:302 I had got that idea too. But I am super talented...2 I had got that idea too. But I am super talented. I can even manage to lose typed things in word/notepad. Even if these word editors prompt for saving before closing. How? Started typing on laptop at night. Dozed off. Woke up in the morning to a battery discharged, auto shutdown laptop :PStupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-44703701726909364762009-08-30T13:34:58.942+05:302009-08-30T13:34:58.942+05:30@Ketan
ok.final batch of reply to your long comm...@Ketan<br /><br /><br />ok.final batch of reply to your long comments.<br /><br />1) I used to write long posts when new to blogging, when I got carried away, and when I was not opposed to giving long hours to blogging. Some of them you can read by clicking the label 'Unnecessarily Looooong Post' on the sidebars. However in these very initial blogging days that I mentioned above, I hadn't become obsessed with labeling comments (Contrast: These days I also have a label 'Yay so many labels' :P) So many long posts went without such label too!Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-7857354284104368282009-08-30T04:58:08.683+05:302009-08-30T04:58:08.683+05:30I like what I see over here :DI like what I see over here :DDhanyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11145740316157180446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-65201379814714857652009-08-29T21:00:16.564+05:302009-08-29T21:00:16.564+05:30@Ketan comment 5
I don't have a 'regular t...@Ketan comment 5<br />I don't have a 'regular time' as such. And even if it was my regular time, these days, chance of me quickly replying away to comments has somehow become very low. And probability of the event would become even lower if I had to reply to a long comment ;)<br /><br />But this comment of mine shows that events with very low but non zero probabilities can actually occur!Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-59474137114362461182009-08-29T19:21:44.355+05:302009-08-29T19:21:44.355+05:30@Ketan
ah mistake! The second 'couple of comme...@Ketan<br />ah mistake! The second 'couple of comments' above is actually supposed to be 'couple of posts'<br /><br />@Comment 3<br /><br />Does deluded have exopthalmos or are you talking about bulging reptilian eyes that I may have?<br /><br />@Comment 4<br /><br />To prove: Srishti can't be having diplopia.<br /><br />We prove it by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum" rel="nofollow">reductio ad absurdum</a>.<br /><br />Assumption: Srishti has diplopia.<br /><br />Proof:<br /><br />If Srishti had diplopia, she would see 2 'i's by typing 1 i. So if she intended to end it with one i, she would try to delete the second i and thus delete the first i too. The she would type an i once again, and repeat the whole process again. But then the comment would never have got successfully published because of the process going into an infinite loop.<br /><br />But comment did get published.<br />So our assupyion is wrong.<br />Which means Srishti doesn't have diplopia.<br /><br /><br />(Yeah yeah, I know there are lots of logical loopholes in the above apparently tight proof :P Its just a spoof on maths and logic ;))Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-76581246903246463612009-08-29T18:16:39.777+05:302009-08-29T18:16:39.777+05:30@Ketan
@Comment 1
Well he did droolingly propose...@Ketan<br /><br />@Comment 1<br /><br />Well he did droolingly propose to 'both' once. But as he was trying to avoid the punch from the girl on the right, he got one straight on the nose from the girl on the left. Since then he is looking for only 'single' girls, so that he would know whose fist/footwear to duck. But as I said, he can't find any.<br /><br /><br />Comment 2:<br />I never meant it to be insulting. I am a natural jerk. Anyways, you went on posting a couple of comments on a couple of comments that I could have taken as insult or humour. So if you found that speculation insulting, I will consider it as an unintended sweet revenge. We are even now. ;)Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-80776939517370868872009-08-29T15:50:21.601+05:302009-08-29T15:50:21.601+05:30Ketan & Deluded
More to come.
Soon!
Or Later....Ketan & Deluded<br /><br />More to come.<br />Soon!<br />Or Later.Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-67673518984745019212009-08-29T15:49:45.012+05:302009-08-29T15:49:45.012+05:30@Scribbler
I am in the prehistory of the future p...@Scribbler<br /><br />I am in the prehistory of the future present. And like you know, existinct. Its a mathematical impossiblity to go from existinct to extinct. As impossible as this comment making any sense.<br /><br />@Ramya<br /><br />Award-Shaward? First it sounded like you are giving Ashirwad. Well, it is. Sort of. Lets hope I bother to decorate my blog one day.<br /><br />Thanks!<br /><br /><br />@Harini<br /><br />LOOLLLL JHALOOOOL, AAI BALA KO BHOOOLLL?<br /><br /><br />@ Srishti<br /><br />Wow! But how? I never sing in high frequency in a high decibel level! The only thing I sing in, is bathroom. Well not really.<br /><br /><br />@Shaunak<br /><br />The double trouble with your comment is that nobody mentioned has a car, and the squint guy isn't two women.<br /><br />HALP!<br />(WELL THAT SPELLING IS ANOTHER TROUBLE, BUT THEN I THOUGHT ITS IN CAPS, SO COULD BE IN ABBREVIATION, FOR SOMETHING LIKE "HACK AWAY 'LIGHT 'PELLING".)<br /><br />Wonder what the full form of what I wrote above is?<br /><br />@Deluded<br /><br />//no threes?<br />BHY BHOODH DHA SKHINTH GHAY KHAIR HABHOOTH HAY THREE? THREES HAR PHISSHED THU THA GHROWNDH ANDHH NOTH SOFTH AND SKHINNHN KHALORD.<br /><br />//your second comment.<br />the second para.<br /><br />HMMH YAAAH BHI KHAM THU THAAATH LHATERRH<br /><br />//ahem ahem.<br /><br />BHISSKI GHOLEE LHO! KHICHHKHICHYHH DHOOOR KRROHH!<br /><br />@hp<br />Too bad P is far from A in QWERTY. Else you could have made a typo and commented<br /><br />hphphphp!<br /><br />That would have added to our fun.<br /><br />@saima<br /><br />Am sometimes replying to comments. As usual. With nothing meaningful said in reply. As usual.<br /><br /><br />@ Shrishti again (I know thats not your surname ;). I have not begun it with capital A :P)<br /><br />Whatever Stupii stands for, can he sit now?<br /><br />Also, maybe Dayal opticians certified you free of hyperopia, myopia, presbyopia (for which you anyways aren't old enough). And of course you don't have diplopia like Ketan idicated. If you had, just typing 1 'i' after Stup would make you see 'ii' and stop and happily wonder how smart the keyboards these days are. Just one stroke and they know how many repeats of it the typer wants! <br /><br />But you do have a rare medical condition in which the subject sees a hundred accusations where there are hardly two.<br /><br />Besides, are you sure you went to Dayal? Maybe you have a rare kind of astigmatism, in which straight lines below every capital P you focus on become blurred so that you see only a D? Maybe it was Payal optician?<br /><br />;)<br /><br />@Anju G (see thats respectful addressing, taking care of your surname too!)<br /><br />That last comment of your was a bit disappointing.<br /><br />I commented because I felt like doing so. There is nothing to thank me about in that. You cant go thanking about everyone who comments on your blog. It would be exhausting for you. And looks a little pathetic too.<br /><br />Maybe now I'll feel like visiting and commenting a little less often :P ;)<br /><br />Besides it also makes me think, you probably didn't even read this post (or any of the links provided) and commented ONLY because I came and commented on your blog. That too, to ensure that if this first time I visited by fluke and am going to forget your blog, I wouldn't :P<br /><br />And its true too. Isn't it ? :P <br /><br />(Yeah well I am a jerk!)<br /><br />Of course, if you are one of those very propah and polite people who genuinely love to use the magic words and feel the feel behind it when doing so, let me say one magic word too<br /><br />"Sorry!"<br /><br />(for what all I just said)Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-54301017994526717352009-08-28T21:50:40.151+05:302009-08-28T21:50:40.151+05:30thanx for dropping by my blog and leaving your com...thanx for dropping by my blog and leaving your comments<br />keep visitingAnjuGandhihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05067542271359917459noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-59117884181842502222009-08-27T23:05:27.369+05:302009-08-27T23:05:27.369+05:30@stupii (thank you so much srishti for that lovely...@stupii (thank you so much srishti for that lovely nick)<br /><br />ok. you guys' fight notwithstanding(I have yet to understand what this big word means), I went read the stupidosaur jokes.<br /><br />do you work in a newspaper?deludedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02770925817624403733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-2456204295530770572009-08-27T22:31:03.617+05:302009-08-27T22:31:03.617+05:30@deluded: I also didn't think your comment was...<b>@deluded:</b> I also didn't think your comment was in reference to my 'pink chaddis' post. I said even <b>if</b> it indeed were, you might find the answer to the doubts/concerns you <b>might</b> share with Stupidosaur. Actually, I too don't know of his concerns. :P I've just <b>speculated</b>, and hoping they turn out to be adequately relevant. TC.Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-52630821770909193572009-08-27T22:07:03.076+05:302009-08-27T22:07:03.076+05:30...Many of the links I leave on your blog are not ......Many of the links I leave on your blog are not even of my posts. Some are not even of my blog. I leave them only so that <b>if</b> you feel curious to read something that you might not know, you'll have to just click on the link rather than searching for it. It doesn't mean I expect you to read that. I'd love to have <b>your</b> comments on my posts, but as I've said in the past, only if they 'incite' a comment in you, and not as some kind of favor returned to me for my devoting time, thoughts, and emotions (to some extent) on your blog. I don't mean to hurt any respondent by individually pointing out to them that there comment was lacking in depth/was insincere, but that doesn't mean, I value them.<br /><br />8. <b>Free will:</b> I'm sorry, I've yet not responded to your comment there as whatever you said was anyway said by me in my response to Mgeek through my example of balance of neurotransmitters. But yes, you did come up with a point that had had me floored--that 'each time we respond to a stimulus, we're actually not 'deciding' that a response (as in a re<b>action</b>) from us is required, but we <b>just do</b> it.' I'm not quoting you verbatim here, but that was the basic idea I'd missed in my analysis. Sorry, I didn't convey my appreciation for your point then and there (my laziness).<br /><br />I think my comment is over. You're free to respond, if and when you feel like. :)<br /><br />TC.<br /><br />PS: I too had lost my drafted comments twice before, that too typing on the cell phone. Telling you not because my perseverance in getting my point through to you is worthy of emulation, rather, I envy the detachment you've been able to achieve from the blogosphere in general, and also (possibly) lost the desire to be heard by specific people. In that sense, you're truly liberated! :)Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-64006270839098036042009-08-27T22:01:52.725+05:302009-08-27T22:01:52.725+05:30...But the reason it concerns me, as our interacti......But the reason it concerns me, as our interactions have increased, the mistrust seems to have only deepened, which I cannot take lightly because of things I've anyway said in this comment. Also, I could sense disgust/hatred in your choice of words like 'shredding to pieces of pink chaddis'. If it is because of your disagreement with my ideas, I can understand, but if it's because it's entirely for me as a person, I'd be indeed somewhat affected (again, the same reasons). Of course, I understand, you can't develop disgust for my ideas, and yet not for me, 'cuz as far as you're concerned my ideas as I communicate them through my blog and comments are equivalent to 'Ketan' for you.<br /><br />Do correct me, if my above two concerns are totally unfounded, and works of my overworked imagination, and also if they're not totally baseless (if you don't clarify at this point, obviously, the latter would persist as my impression of your ideas about me).<br /><br />5. I totally understand what it feels like. I just hope, that's not partly the reason, you might find me 'taxing'! Our mind does attach 'unpleasant' experiences with feelings that'd tend to distance us from exposure to the same painful stimulus! Like, you starting to dislike my blog!<br /><br />6. This is something I couldn't understand. Are you trying to say, some of my posts are too verbose? Yes, it's possible. I do have problems with maintaining succinctness. I used to contribute on Wikipedia, and realized, there people could convey the same idea without any loss of meaning in fewer words.<br /><br />But if you mean, I discuss too many ideas, in too much details, that's because I'd like to avoid having to clarify things individually while commenting. Despite my writing long (in my attempt, unambiguous) posts, there've been occasions when intelligent readers have entirely missed the point! Or if you mean, many of my posts lack an element of emotion, yes, you're right. They do lack that. And of course, everything I think and conclude can't be disconnected from my emotions. But maybe, my step-by-step approach, and the fact that I don't include my emotional responses in my post could leave that impression.<br /><br />Or maybe, you might mean, there are a few issues that are (ought to be) beyond penetration of intellect, then of course, I disagree, and hence, that kind of posts. :)<br /><br />7. I understand. Actually, it's very wrong of me to be devoting so much time to blogging (actually, commenting, which is much more time-consuming)...Ketanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02622410643454108685noreply@blogger.com