tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post1745751176184052481..comments2023-10-17T13:20:45.145+05:30Comments on The Little Ranting Reptile and Other Stories....: Pretending to be Super Smart - About Universe and StuffStupidosaurhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-72452924467349377832009-11-24T11:57:49.074+05:302009-11-24T11:57:49.074+05:30"Total of Space and Time in the Universe rema..."Total of Space and Time in the Universe remains constant."<br /><br />Your entire theory starts of with this assumption. <br /><br />If they are NOT finite...? Then there is no point in talking about inverse proportionality between space and time, is it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-32020247582648732182009-05-20T00:27:00.000+05:302009-05-20T00:27:00.000+05:30*yawns* see...i have so many ways of wasting time....*yawns* see...i have so many ways of wasting time... <br />i'll just comment senselessly on somebody's blog just to waste their space...<br />btw,be careful while applying this reverse law(simple eg: antiderivative in concept is different from integral).<br /><br />I think my 's' key is not working properly :S<br />It looks like I made grammatical errors(as if sp & logical ones were not nuff!) all the time in the above comment x-(Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-27630072909752333772009-05-19T18:36:00.000+05:302009-05-19T18:36:00.000+05:30*Pretending to be extra clever :P *
I haven't...*Pretending to be extra clever :P *<br /><br />I haven't studied this, whatever I make of this, is from your post :D<br /><br />So here goes,<br /><br />If I'm getting you correct: You're Wrong, but then, i mayn't have gotten you correctly at all, I sincerely don't your concept of 'time'<br />Suppose everything stops ---> time=infinity and <I>time flow</I>=0<br /><br />"When universe was packed into an infinitecimal space, time flow was infinity"<br /><br />when the space was nothing, time was infinity, time flow = 0;<br /><br />Then one thing more: what if everything stops now? If it does, time will become infinity, and there will be no time flow. In that case, I'm correctly thinking of an absurd phenomenon, so yeah, all the space must get 0, so yay! nothing happens to me right now...atleast not right now...<br /><br />What if all known physics rule break down? Simply because something is indeterminate, does not mean it is absurd! Thats what I call nature, and thats why I'm not a believer.<br /><br />I somehow like your fourth point, maximum time(though you call it time death) =minimum heat. My instinct are somehow at peace with it...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-6415101207225498232009-05-19T15:57:00.000+05:302009-05-19T15:57:00.000+05:30bhaut bada hein yaar .... isko padhne mein tu atle...bhaut bada hein yaar .... isko padhne mein tu atleast 3-4 sittings lagegi ...Nitinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11953630466493595807noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-31817615995975939812009-05-18T01:22:00.000+05:302009-05-18T01:22:00.000+05:30you don't have to ask questions when you have the ...you don't have to ask questions when you have the answers. unless you're trying to provoke others into discussions. the problem is, i don't know much of anything, and anything of much.<br /><br />there was a time, when you troubled my symmetries ssor, its still paining me deep inside. everything else after those 'moments', and my interaction with your here is for me to wash away the pain.<br /><br />im not a defeatist, i just dont want to go into tirades with someone who I dont know the reason. but as I have always said, you are a very smart man, I admire you for that. And i would also, never forgive you for that.<br /><br />my life is an endless cycle of futile glories. thank you for contributing to it.gPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07439371766182405053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-69515253294236700612009-05-17T23:33:00.000+05:302009-05-17T23:33:00.000+05:30whatever! Stupid!
:Dwhatever! Stupid!<br /><br /><B>:D</B>Nachihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07393880086806980882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-88238626119950378112009-05-17T18:18:00.000+05:302009-05-17T18:18:00.000+05:30@ hp
that youre fat?@ hp<br /><br />that youre fat?deludedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02770925817624403733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-68666940432141192862009-05-17T17:38:00.000+05:302009-05-17T17:38:00.000+05:30oh .. ok .. so i was saying ..
if i'm running la...oh .. ok .. so i was saying .. <br /><br />if i'm running late for something.. what does it really mean ?HPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00470098198498971293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-23752528166580590112009-05-17T17:37:00.000+05:302009-05-17T17:37:00.000+05:30have you enabled comment moderation or are my comm...have you enabled comment moderation or are my comments really not getting posted? os is there something wrong with blogger? ..or with my connection ??HPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00470098198498971293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-21159772859915589422009-05-17T16:24:00.000+05:302009-05-17T16:24:00.000+05:30of course, without Mountain Dew all this time spac...of course, without Mountain Dew all this time space shit wouldn't have been possible.<br /><br />All time is bunk and we all are on this planet just to fart around.<br /><br />Yeah. Stay confused.<br /><br />N<br /><br />oh hey, and it IS Shish Kebabs, i checked in dictionary before writing that :PPallavhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09597178864833810868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-77445111706479195952009-05-17T13:20:00.000+05:302009-05-17T13:20:00.000+05:30lalalaaaaaa
*too dumb to give any meaningful com...lalalaaaaaa<br /><br /><br />*too dumb to give any meaningful commentdeludedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02770925817624403733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-34597819359339334352009-05-17T12:53:00.000+05:302009-05-17T12:53:00.000+05:30As far as usual blogging comment is concerned here...As far as usual blogging comment is concerned here it is:<br />What a lovely way to start a Sunday! I loved this!<br /><br />Now commenting as a 'normal' human being (ya an Engineer, CS, studied physics and loved it more than the usual mathematics):<br /><br />Firstly, I also want to know what was there before time came into existence.. Bing bang must have happened with some kind of matter. How that matter came into picture.. What is a picture anyway? I guess time is seriously different for everyone. Speeds varies for everyone. I even think what I call Orange might be green for you which in turn might be red for me. And why is the speed of light a constant when everything else is not constant. I understand that a number of laws have been based upon the facts that speed of light doesn't change and anything else cannot attain the speed of light.<br /><br />I want to write more but ...!!ABhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18040990686933827142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-68972251485504882582009-05-17T12:44:00.000+05:302009-05-17T12:44:00.000+05:30About your P.S.:
True Scientists should be focuss...About your P.S.:<br /><br />True Scientists should be focussed on Truth, not ego :P<br /><br /><br />Of course Newton did have a big bloated ego ;). And that took him places.<br /><br />And he used those places as well as still existing Ego to set Sole Lion's Share of Claim on lot of calculus stuff which he and another fellow (I think Lagrange or Raphson) both did independently at same time. <br /><br />But then we are going off the tangent of the ideal, discribing trifle realities.<br /><br />I say again: Science is about truth, not egoes.<br /><br />Of course when it comes to matter of credit, and you deserve it, bloat your Ego to mthe maximum to get it ;) <br /><br /><br />Thanks for being impressed by my thining! (though it didn't really leave an impression on you ;) )<br /><br />I am compelled to write. Don't worry in that department!Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-24496989166406371942009-05-17T12:24:00.000+05:302009-05-17T12:24:00.000+05:30//different path for a while. but i have always he...//different path for a while. but i have always held on to one principle, if there is a possibility of something different evolving, its already being worked on in some lab by some fine soul who is living their dreams of physics<br /><br />Arggggh! I am sickened by your attitude! Where's the washroom? I need to puke!<br /><br />Dude, Maxwell was a mere clerk in the university - Clerk Maxwell is the name if you remember.<br /><br />Einstein was technical expert third class (and later second class) at Bern patent office when he proposed a lots of fascinating stuff.<br /><br />Science is through the mind. Labs are mere support functions! Labs are pretty important, but not the most important!<br /><br />I am not saying I am Maxwell or Einstein here. This isn't about me. Its about your defeatist attitude!Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-24379629666246032812009-05-17T12:08:00.000+05:302009-05-17T12:08:00.000+05:30Oops! read the
//1
above as
//2
I don't need...Oops! read the<br />//1<br />above as <br />//2<br /><br />I don't need to comment on <br />//1 <br />& <br />//3. <br />I already said a lots of things related to it in my very first comment. Though I may add.<br /><br />Science is not mind tricks done for our entertainment. Its not games ( though the spirit should be similar ;)). What it tries to do is very definitely describe the observed and try to very rigorously<br />extrapolate to what it cannot observe, and then of course find new ways to observe what it earlier could not observe!<br /><br />Its search for the truth. Its through the mind, but not about the mind. It progresses through mental notions. But its not mental notions. <br /><br />Though of course one day it may get scientifically established what big dunces humans are and that all our estabished truths were after all baseless notions, cos they had missed some very fundamental thing ;)Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-38311468728298040102009-05-17T11:56:00.000+05:302009-05-17T11:56:00.000+05:30//1
By backtracking I just mean mathematical tratm...//1<br />By backtracking I just mean mathematical tratment, no magic.<br /><br />I am under the impression that scientists are of the view that space and time as we know it came to just at/after the big bang. That is when known laws applicable to this particular universe fell into place. Reverse playing this scenario, the problem is, what the heck were the laws before that?<br /><br />My new notion is, that time existed anyways and was at/just before big bang infinite in flow. Its the space that came into existance at big bang. And it was zero or infinitecimal, or at some finite fundamental lower limit (as hopefully some equation may shed light on).<br /><br />So by cleverly playing these limits into existing laws, we may get insights on what was there before it all began/when it all began? (remember, deriving limits of a function as its variables tend to a particular value was high school mathematics?)Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-80048286544371596512009-05-17T11:38:00.000+05:302009-05-17T11:38:00.000+05:30Nope time is not a 'notion'. Its a very fundamenta...Nope time is not a 'notion'. Its a very fundamental physical quantity. Remember space-time equivalence? Its the fourth dimension. Nothing real can exist unless it exists in space AND time. Existance can't be a matter of 'man made notion'. <br /><br />In fact in a way,everything is a mere 'notion'. Space, time, mass, energy, motion, light, colours, etc, everything is a notion. But neverthless notions which we humans rather were compelled to form based on a deep internal pull in our heads that yes, there seems to be bloody hell something 'real' like it. Of course to make those internal tugs and pulls of instinct scientific, we went about proposing very definite definitions of these. But these things don't exist because of our notional definitions. Our notional definitions arise because of their existance, or rather our belief in their existance.<br /><br />Sheesh! I am highly disappointed by your initial argument! Time is as natural as any other thing like space, energy and yada yada I menationed. If it is not natural, none of the other things are :P<br /><br />And whether time does have beginning or end is what scientists have been breaking their heads over since ages, with theories, mathematics and experiments! How can you just come along and make a strong claim without basis? And yes, time may be said to have a direction. And as per some school of thoughts, it can only go forward. Though as per relativity, it can slow down or become fast. My theory (if it is one) only has infinite fast and zero flow of time as extremes. It does not talk of time reversal, though nowhere does it rule that out either.Stupidosaurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14440677810342540223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-74231287482554916472009-05-17T09:37:00.000+05:302009-05-17T09:37:00.000+05:30you are in the right path.
but lets remember: tim...you are in the right path.<br /><br />but lets remember: time is a man made notion, its not natural, neither does it have a beginning nor an end. time, however, does have a direction, hence your reverse probabilistic work (in your theory).<br /><br />//1) If this principle ...// no, the universe is a conservation of energy. time is not a quantity remember.<br /><br />//2)...// i dont know how to actually reverse or backtrack laws of physics. we can make mathematical guesses of what existed during the Plank seconds, but then im not sure if backtracking is all possible.<br /><br />//3)....// back to the quantity issue...time is not. an all time universe might only exists in our mind :)<br /><br />//4)...// hmmm....again...<br /><br />im not an expert in physics, not even an average dude right now considering ive deviated to a different path for a while. but i have always held on to one principle, if there is a possibility of something different evolving, its already being worked on in some lab by some fine soul who is living their dreams of physics :) not to say that we dont have a chance in proposing something new, the problem lies in the fact that, new physics are old physics now. finding something new in our space dimension is as remote as ever considering we are governed by proven laws of physics.<br /><br />im very very impressed by your line of thinking, and i hope you write more :)<br /><br /><br />p/s: i dont know any physics experts who are civilized enough to address issues in a balanced environment. its the scientist ego that makes them go another day. hope u understand.gPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07439371766182405053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8390663173947135876.post-52767451406668201042009-05-17T09:35:00.000+05:302009-05-17T09:35:00.000+05:30This comment has been removed by the author.gPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07439371766182405053noreply@blogger.com